Evaluation
CRITICALLY
REFLECT ON YOUR FINISHED FILM AND IT'S STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES - ANALYSE THE
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT YOU INTENDED TO DO AND WHAT YOU HAVE ACTUALLY ACHIEVED.
I am really
happy with the finished project, I took on the role of director and I really
enjoyed my first project in this role. In its early stages when we were coming
up with the initial plan, I considered how we were going to make this subject
matter a poetic documentary, we ran the risk of having too much information and
too many talking heads, we wanted to find a way of making the form and content complement
each other. We decided on using bright colours early on, and we practiced this technique
when making our poetic sequence. I felt it worked really well and it made the
subject matter more interesting to look at. One of the things that I feel really
showed through in our work was the camera technique, we all practiced with
different lens’s on the camera’s and found what worked best with which kind of
shot we wanted to capture, we also familiarised ourselves more with how to
properly change the ISO and Aperture, as we knew we would be shooting in some
difficult locations such as night clubs and bars. I feel this one of our strong
points and because we really utilised the time before we began shooting our 10
minute documentary to practice this. For the roles, Charlotte was the producer,
Chris was in charge of sound recording and editing, and Danni was our project
editor. For camera it was a combination effort from myself, Chris and
Charlotte. I feel the workload was fairly distributed between us, time
management was a problem as there were only three of us in the pre-production
roles, and I was present for all of these shoots, while planning in my spare
time. The project went through several stages in the edit, as we had decided on
a format, we wanted to originally show the subject matter going from day to
night, so our plan was to use the café interviews that were filmed during the
day in the first half of our documentary, and then to use the evening bar and
working men’s club footage to end our documentary. We were pretty set on this
structure, but when we got the footage into the edit which I will go into later
we struggled at first to gauge how we were going to keep it. The interviews
were too long, this was my fault as the interviewer I found it difficult to
keep the interviewee’s answers short and concise, managing this effectively in
only one of the interviews. This proved difficult to edit and wreaked havoc
with our original structure. After a tutorial we were eventually put back on
track, after being initially over faced by the amount of footage. I was
actually really happy with the final structure that we came up with I feel we
had achieved a clear cut beginning and end and the piece flowed really well. There wasn't a vast difference in what we intended to do and what we actually did, the structure stayed much the same even though we started to doubt it in the
middle of editing, we stuck to our vision of capturing, I think a lot of our
skill lied in our resourcefulness, we really tried hard to get the interviews
necessary and I wrote out a list of interview question’s so we didn't overlap
any important information and so we could keep track of the information we had
gathered, we used the locations in my opinion to their full potential,
experimenting with interesting angles and composition.
REVIEW THE PROCESS OF MAKING THE WORK AND WHAT
YOU HAVE LEARNT FROM IT.
During making
our documentary, I learnt quite a few things that I think are really important,
as I feel that with documentary the most important thing is to plan for things
that don’t work, as you don’t often have enough time to re-shoot them as you do
with drama or experimental. The interviews are one of the trickiest things to
do well, as it is hard to get a realistic performance out of your subject; you
have to bear in mind constantly how their answers are going to sound in the
edit. One of the things that I struggled with was being quiet during one of the
interviews, as one of our interviewee’s kept looking to me for reassurance and I
found it difficult not to answer back to him. I have learnt to leave more time
for the edit, as we left ourselves only five days, which was unintentional, as
interviews kept getting rearranged and part of my group had previous
commitments to other work. In retrospect it would have been better to have more
time to play around with the edit more. I learnt so much more about camera work
in this module as our documentary required a variety of different techniques, I
feel I can now confidently use DSLR, and have a good knowledge of the different
lens’s and how to work under low light. I feel that my knowledge of editing has
grown also, as this is the longest duration project I have worked on, so it is
has been enlightening to see how much planning needs to go into it, as admittedly
you could get away with less planning on smaller projects in favour of a more experimental
aesthetic, but with an informational piece it is difficult to see the fine line
between what is too much or too little, I feel that we got the balance right
with quite a lot of tweaking and putting a few more hours in to the edit. The
documentary production has been very enjoyable, I most liked playing around
with the camera, and interviewing. I would definitely opt for a directing role
again as I feel I was competent and organised and we ended up with a great
final product.
DISCUSS YOUR INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION TO MAKING THE WORK, YOUR APPROACH TO
GROUP WORK AND ANY PROBLEMS OR CHALLENGES YOU ENCOUNTERED WORKING AS PART OF A
TEAM. (APPROX 400 WORDS)
As I stated above, I was the director for this project, I have never directed properly before and i found that it was quite a challenge as it is difficult to take full responsibility for the shoots, it was hard to take full creative control, as you end up second guessing some of the footage you have captured and despite planning beforehand things inevitably change during the shoot. My main concern was to capture as much quality footage as possible for cutaways as this makes up a large percentage of our documentary as we didn't want to focus to much on the talking heads. Another problem i faced was the structure, which didn't really get resolved until the edit, the edit for me was the most difficult part, as it was really hard for Danni to get on with the edit, i decided we should transcribe all of the interviews, there was four so we did one each, it gave me the chance to look over the script as a whole and highlight certain bits that i thought were key and that i wanted to keep in. I gave these notes to Danni and i left her to it after a while, as i think it was difficult for her to get on with the edit while i was sat there, but until we had a clear structure that worked it was hard for me to leave. I think its hard to get the balance between a director and editor because with documentary its very much about the directors vision with the piece, and due to work commitments Danni had only been able to come to one of the shoots so i think that made it more difficult for me to explain my ideas to her. But in the end we separated for a day and when i came back i was so impressed with what she had done with the piece, she had taken all the stuff from the tutorial on board and it really fit with our groups original idea. Once we had the basis structure in place it was much easier for us to edit together, rearranging and putting in more cutaways and chopping more out of the interview. For the sound i had envisioned that it would have music playing the whole way through, because i wanted to keep the piece uplifting and i wanted to keep pace, Charlotte found the music for the piece as we were obviously going for a northern soul style with the music, we got the rights to all of the tracks and they fit perfectly onto the documentary, and we began to tighten the edit around the songs. I feel this is where the piece really came into its own, i went through the finished piece and wrote sound notes up for Chris to edit, i did this by writing the exact time in the video and a description of what i wanted doing and giving it to him. We tried to be experimental with the sound, there was one part where the shot was of the exterior of the working mens club, we then tried to play around with the EQ on the sound to make the music sound like it was coming from inside the club. During the presentation of the work i was disappointed that this didn't come off as well as i had hoped, but it seems to work better when watching the clip on vimeo at a computer. I wanted to tie the beginning and end together, as with a lot of the projects i work on i finf this is really effective giving the piece a fully formed feel. We did this by using some of the archive footage we found of a record going down onto the player in an old style dukebox. we played this at the beginning and end and i found it worked really well.
WITH REFERENCE TO THE TEXTS GIVEN IN SESSIONS AND THE MATERIALS ON THE
READING LIST; REVIEW YOUR APPROACH TO MAKING THE WORK AND LOCATE YOUR PRACTICE
WITHIN A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK.
I wouldn't say that our documentary was an observational documentary, as we have opted for a more stylised approach, we looked at documentaries shown to us in the seminar, and in particular we focused mainly on documentaries that don't have a main interviewer leading the documentary, as this was difficult to do as a student. I think a lot of our textual influences came from a more modern type of documentary, inspired by shorts on Vimeo, such as 'Prime' we were extremely concerned with the aesthetic of the piece, rather than the content. With regards to the original assessment guidelines i feel we strayed away from the idea of making a truly poetic documentary in favour of having something that we could show to a prospective employer, after reading some Bill Nichol's books such as representing reality and introducing the documentary, i realised that although we did indeed break the pattern of continuity up as much as possible, we weren't really true to the genre as we had main characters that we kept coming back to. The film is still quite fragmentary and we have tried to make the image and sound compliment each other and i feel that the result has a very lyrical feel to it, it seems to flow quite seamlessly. Nichols states that the 'Real world' was fragmented, and using film form was put back together. Which i feel we have actually done in our documentary, as we have taken information and image from all through the genre in Sheffield and reconstituted it into our own aesthetic and impression of the feel of the subject.
I wouldn't say that our documentary was an observational documentary, as we have opted for a more stylised approach, we looked at documentaries shown to us in the seminar, and in particular we focused mainly on documentaries that don't have a main interviewer leading the documentary, as this was difficult to do as a student. I think a lot of our textual influences came from a more modern type of documentary, inspired by shorts on Vimeo, such as 'Prime' we were extremely concerned with the aesthetic of the piece, rather than the content. With regards to the original assessment guidelines i feel we strayed away from the idea of making a truly poetic documentary in favour of having something that we could show to a prospective employer, after reading some Bill Nichol's books such as representing reality and introducing the documentary, i realised that although we did indeed break the pattern of continuity up as much as possible, we weren't really true to the genre as we had main characters that we kept coming back to. The film is still quite fragmentary and we have tried to make the image and sound compliment each other and i feel that the result has a very lyrical feel to it, it seems to flow quite seamlessly. Nichols states that the 'Real world' was fragmented, and using film form was put back together. Which i feel we have actually done in our documentary, as we have taken information and image from all through the genre in Sheffield and reconstituted it into our own aesthetic and impression of the feel of the subject.










